Kenya’s High Court made a landmark ruling on January 22, 2026, declaring the appointment of over 20 advisers to President William Ruto’s administration unconstitutional and ordering an immediate halt to their salaries. Justice Bahati Mwamuye, who delivered the ruling, emphasized that the process through which the advisers were appointed lacked transparency and was conducted through confidential correspondence, undermining the principles of accountability.
The court’s decision has sparked a debate over the legitimacy of these appointments, with prominent figures, including Makau Mutua, David Ndii, Joseph Boinnet, and several others, being named among the illegally appointed advisers. These individuals, who have collectively earned over KSh 2.44 billion in salaries since their appointment, have been receiving over KSh 600,000 each in monthly pay, with additional perks bringing their total earnings to over KSh 1 million.
Justice Mwamuye’s ruling highlights a critical issue: the absence of oversight from the Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC), a key body responsible for ensuring that state employees’ pay is reasonable and in line with the law. The court also criticized the lack of transparency in the appointment process, which it deemed an antithesis of what is expected from public service in Kenya.
The ruling has raised questions about the future of these advisers and their roles in the government. While some have argued that the decision could spark a political backlash, others have praised the court for upholding the rule of law and ensuring that the government adheres to constitutional principles.
In related news, the ruling has led to increased tensions within the political sphere, with critics accusing President Ruto’s administration of disregarding legal procedures. The move to stop the advisers’ pay is seen as a significant victory for those advocating for transparency and accountability in government operations.
